GMAT Course Discounts | GMAT Course Reviews

Analysis of arguments: Common logical fallacies

[This topic has 0 member replies]
Write Like an Expert Series: Breaking Down This Year's Top B-School Essays – From HBS to GSB, experts break down each essay. This series is FREE. Reserve Your Spot!
Post New Topic   Post Reply

Top Beat The GMAT Member
arora007
GMAT Destroyer!

Joined: 17 Aug 2009
Posts: 482

Thanks given: 78
Thanked 9 times in 9 posts
Location: India

Target GMAT Score: XYZ
GMAT Score: 670

Topic: Analysis of arguments: Common logical fallacies
PostSat Jul 03, 2010 9:35 pm

Elapsed Time:
00:00
Lap   Improve your GMAT score with this timer

I read it in one of the notes...
The E-rater will look for how well you express that you have identified the logical reasoning flaws. When you find an error, specifically identify it in the essay "this is a biased sample fallacy." The E-rater will detect that you have identified the argument's flaw and will favor your essay.

I will jot down the fallacies and would like to ask... if this really is the case? does the e-rater prefer that we explicitly mention the fallacy type which is present in the argument ??

1/ Circular reasoning: An unsubstantiated assertion is used to justify another unsubstantiated assertion.
2/ Biased-sample fallacy: A sample that is not representative of the population is under consideration.
3/ Insufficient sample fallacy: When an inadequate sample is used to justify the conclusion drawn
4/ Ad hominen: An attack is made upon a person rather than upon the statement that person has made.
5/ Faulty Analogy: Similarity drawn between things that are not relevant to characteristic being inferred.
6/ Straw Man: The person is potrayed as someone that they are not.
7/ After this, therefore because of this: fallacy in which something is associated with something else because of mere proximity of time.
8/ Black or White fallacy: Either you believe what I'm saying or you must believe exactly the opposite.
9/ All things are equal: It is assumed without justification that background conditions have remained the same at different times/locations.
10/ Equivocation: when a word or phrase that has more than one meaning is employed in different meanings throughout the argument.
11/ Non Sequitor/does not follow: The conclusion has no intrinsic connection from the premise.
12/ Argument ad populum : Polls are good for telling what people think, not whether those thoughts are correct. It assumes expertise where it simply cannot be assumed.
13/ Irrational appeals: urge us to accept the ideas at face value or on some basis other than reasonableness. They could be false appeals to common sense, appeals to emotion, and appeals to authority.

_________________
http://www.skiponemeal.org/
http://twitter.com/skiponemeal

Few things are impossible to diligence and skill. Great works are performed not by strength, but perseverance.

Happy Teachers day!!
Recommend this topic
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Beat The GMAT Practice Questions -- You'll Love Them!
Display posts from previous:   

Post New Topic   Post Reply All times are GMT - 7 Hours
Page 1 of 1
 
Best Conversation Starters
1. gmat_perfect 93 topics
2. sanju09 86 topics
3. pradeepkaushal9518 57 topics
4. Gurpinder 53 topics
5. adi_800 30 topics
Most Active Experts
1. Tani Wolff - Kaplan
Kaplan GMAT Teacher
145 posts
2. Rahul@gurome
Gurome
131 posts
3. GMATGuruNY
The Princeton Review Teacher
100 posts
4. Stuart Kovinsky
Kaplan GMAT Teacher
95 posts
5. David@VeritasPrep
Veritas Prep
77 posts