• Veritas Prep
    Free Veritas GMAT Class
    Experience Lesson 1 Live Free

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    Veritas Prep
  • PrepScholar GMAT
    5 Day FREE Trial
    Study Smarter, Not Harder

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    PrepScholar GMAT
  • e-gmat Exclusive Offer
    Get 300+ Practice Questions
    25 Video lessons and 6 Webinars for FREE

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    e-gmat Exclusive Offer
  • Economist Test Prep
    Free Trial & Practice Exam
    BEAT THE GMAT EXCLUSIVE

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    Economist Test Prep
  • Kaplan Test Prep
    Free Practice Test & Review
    How would you score if you took the GMAT

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    Kaplan Test Prep
  • Magoosh
    Magoosh
    Study with Magoosh GMAT prep

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    Magoosh
  • Varsity Tutors
    Award-winning private GMAT tutoring
    Register now and save up to $200

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    Varsity Tutors
  • Target Test Prep
    5-Day Free Trial
    5-day free, full-access trial TTP Quant

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    Target Test Prep
  • EMPOWERgmat Slider
    1 Hour Free
    BEAT THE GMAT EXCLUSIVE

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    EMPOWERgmat Slider

Analysis of Argument

This topic has 0 member replies
Amey229 Newbie | Next Rank: 10 Posts
Joined
21 Dec 2016
Posted:
1 messages

Analysis of Argument

Post Wed Dec 21, 2016 11:30 pm
Elapsed Time: 00:00
  • Lap #[LAPCOUNT] ([LAPTIME])
    The following appeared as part of an annual report sent to stockholders by Olympic Foods, a processor of frozen
    foods:
    “Over time, the costs of processing go down because as organizations learn how to do things better, they become
    more efficient. In color film processing, for example, the cost of a 3-by-5-inch print fell from 50 cents for five-day service in 1970 to 20 cents for one-day service in 1984. The same principle applies to the processing of food. And since Olympic Foods will soon celebrate its 25th birthday, we can expect that our long experience will enable us to minimize costs and thus maximize profits.”

    AWA Essay

    The author's argument that Long experience will lead to minimization of costs and maximization of profits is flawed. In drawing this conclusion the author assumes that minimizing cost will definitely maximize profits. Also, in color film processing the author compares the price fall of a 5-day service to a 1-day service. Furthermore, comparing color film processing and food processing is a bit illogical since both have different types of processing techniques.

    In the argument, the author bases the conclusion on the assumption that decrease in costs will lead to increase in profits. If, for example the sales go down then decrease in costs might lead to a no profit no loss scenario. Worst case situation, if the losses occurred by the decrease in sales are more than the profits occurred by decrease in costs, the organization might face tremendous losses. Since the author does not provide any information regarding the sales it is impossible to determine if the profits will increase.

    Secondly,color film processing and food processing are two different organizations. The author implies that the same principle of color film processing is applicable to food processing. Since an example of how the same application works in food processing is not given the comparison is invalid.

    Lastly,in color film processing the author compares the price fall of a 5-day service to a 1-day service. In 1970 the price of 5-day service was 50 cents which implies 10 cents a day. In 1984 the price of 1 day service was 20 cents which implies an increase in the cost by 10 cents, while the argument states it as a decrease in price. Generally we compare two similar entities to determine the difference between them.Thus the comparison made by the author is incorrect.

    The argument could be strengthened if the author were to concede that the decrease in costs might lead to increase in profits provided the sales don't decrease as well. Also by comparing the price fall of similar entities and giving an example of how the food processing organization would apply the same principle of color film processing the argument could have been strengthened more. As it stands, however, the argument is flawed for the reasons indicated.

    Need free GMAT or MBA advice from an expert? Register for Beat The GMAT now and post your question in these forums!

    Best Conversation Starters

    1 Vincen 180 topics
    2 lheiannie07 65 topics
    3 Roland2rule 49 topics
    4 ardz24 44 topics
    5 LUANDATO 23 topics
    See More Top Beat The GMAT Members...

    Most Active Experts

    1 image description Brent@GMATPrepNow

    GMAT Prep Now Teacher

    147 posts
    2 image description Rich.C@EMPOWERgma...

    EMPOWERgmat

    103 posts
    3 image description GMATGuruNY

    The Princeton Review Teacher

    102 posts
    4 image description EconomistGMATTutor

    The Economist GMAT Tutor

    94 posts
    5 image description DavidG@VeritasPrep

    Veritas Prep

    76 posts
    See More Top Beat The GMAT Experts