Hello everybody.
I am starting to study for the GMAT test and right now I am looking at the algebra section, in which I seem have some fundamental misunderstanding, so hope you are able to guide me a bit.
I am having trouble solving the following question:
Determine the value of x as specifically as possible by manipulating the inequalities:
0>x and -(1/x)> 17
When I am trying to manipulate the second inequality I would do the following:
1) multiply with x on each side to get:
-1> 17x
2) divide by 17 on each side to get:
-(1/17)> x
in the meantime when I see the correct result is says:
-(1/17)<x
Could anybody please help giving me some directions.
Thanks in advance
Lucas
5-Day Free Trial
5-day free, full-access trial TTP
Available with Beat the GMAT members only code
MORE DETAILS
Algebra Basic rules
This topic has expert replies
-
GMATinsight
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 1100
- Joined: Sat May 10, 2014 11:34 pm
- Location: New Delhi, India
- Thanked: 205 times
- Followed by:24 members
Solve : 0>x and -(1/x)> 17lucas211 wrote: Determine the value of x as specifically as possible by manipulating the inequalities:
0>x and -(1/x)> 17
Lucas
Given 0 > x i.e. x is Negative
Now Solving : -(1/x)> 17
Step 1: Multiply (x) on both Sides and Reverse the Inequality Sign because the multiplier 'x' is negative
(x)*[-(1/x)] < 17*(x)
i.e. (-1) < 17x
Step 2: Divide both Sides by (17)
(-1)/17 < 17x/17
(-1/17) < x
"GMATinsight"Bhoopendra Singh & Sushma Jha
Most Comprehensive and Affordable Video Course 2000+ CONCEPT Videos and Video Solutions
Whatsapp/Mobile: +91-9999687183 l [email protected]
Contact for One-on-One FREE ONLINE DEMO Class Call/e-mail
Most Efficient and affordable One-On-One Private tutoring fee - US$40-50 per hour
Most Comprehensive and Affordable Video Course 2000+ CONCEPT Videos and Video Solutions
Whatsapp/Mobile: +91-9999687183 l [email protected]
Contact for One-on-One FREE ONLINE DEMO Class Call/e-mail
Most Efficient and affordable One-On-One Private tutoring fee - US$40-50 per hour
-
lucas211
- Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
- Posts: 97
- Joined: Mon Aug 04, 2014 5:39 pm
- Thanked: 1 times
- Followed by:2 members
Hi again.
First of all sorry for my late reply ( I am travelling in Brazil and am struggeling with internet-connection sometimes
Thanks for the reply, which I have a further question to:
If we multiply the equation by negative ´x`on each side, shouldnt the other side of the equation become -17x and +1 on the first side of the equation?
Thanks a lot in advance.
Lucas
First of all sorry for my late reply ( I am travelling in Brazil and am struggeling with internet-connection sometimes
Thanks for the reply, which I have a further question to:
If we multiply the equation by negative ´x`on each side, shouldnt the other side of the equation become -17x and +1 on the first side of the equation?
Thanks a lot in advance.
Lucas
-
GMATinsight
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 1100
- Joined: Sat May 10, 2014 11:34 pm
- Location: New Delhi, India
- Thanked: 205 times
- Followed by:24 members
Please check the statement that I haeve Underlined in my previous comment.lucas211 wrote:Hi again.
First of all sorry for my late reply ( I am travelling in Brazil and am struggeling with internet-connection sometimes
Thanks for the reply, which I have a further question to:
If we multiply the equation by negative ´x`on each side, shouldnt the other side of the equation become -17x and +1 on the first side of the equation?
Thanks a lot in advance.
Lucas
We haven't multiplied Negative x on both sides instead we have multiplied x on both sides which happens to be a negative value and Since it's Negative therefore multiplying x is equivalent to multiplying a negative number therefore it changes the sign of Inequality.
Alternative to check whether your result is correct or not
Pick a number and check if it satisfies the given equation
"GMATinsight"Bhoopendra Singh & Sushma Jha
Most Comprehensive and Affordable Video Course 2000+ CONCEPT Videos and Video Solutions
Whatsapp/Mobile: +91-9999687183 l [email protected]
Contact for One-on-One FREE ONLINE DEMO Class Call/e-mail
Most Efficient and affordable One-On-One Private tutoring fee - US$40-50 per hour
Most Comprehensive and Affordable Video Course 2000+ CONCEPT Videos and Video Solutions
Whatsapp/Mobile: +91-9999687183 l [email protected]
Contact for One-on-One FREE ONLINE DEMO Class Call/e-mail
Most Efficient and affordable One-On-One Private tutoring fee - US$40-50 per hour
-
Matt@VeritasPrep
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 2630
- Joined: Wed Sep 12, 2012 3:32 pm
- Location: East Bay all the way
- Thanked: 625 times
- Followed by:119 members
- GMAT Score:780
Just to follow up here, Lucas, one way you can think about this:
Most people read "-x" as "x is negative", but it really should be read as (-1) * x.
The expression -x doesn't mean that x is a negative number: it means that you're taking x, whatever it is, and multiplying it by -1; in other words, changing the sign.
For instance, if x = -3, then -x = -(-3), or (-1)*(-3), or 3.
Most people read "-x" as "x is negative", but it really should be read as (-1) * x.
The expression -x doesn't mean that x is a negative number: it means that you're taking x, whatever it is, and multiplying it by -1; in other words, changing the sign.
For instance, if x = -3, then -x = -(-3), or (-1)*(-3), or 3.
-
diegocml
- Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
- Posts: 67
- Joined: Tue Mar 15, 2016 10:35 am
- Thanked: 7 times
- GMAT Score:410
I'm so glad I've found this thread and I'd be grateful if someone could correct me if I'm wrong.
Also, apologies if my question is a bit off topic.
Is it correct to say that:
1) negative^even = positive ==> i.e.: -2^2 = 4
2) (negative)^even = positive ==> (-2)^2 = 4
3) -(negative)^even = negative ==> -(-2)^2 = -4 ==> If I'm not mistaken this example goes more or less in line with what Matt explained above.
Thanks a lot for your help and time.
Diego
Also, apologies if my question is a bit off topic.
Is it correct to say that:
1) negative^even = positive ==> i.e.: -2^2 = 4
2) (negative)^even = positive ==> (-2)^2 = 4
3) -(negative)^even = negative ==> -(-2)^2 = -4 ==> If I'm not mistaken this example goes more or less in line with what Matt explained above.
Thanks a lot for your help and time.
Diego
Diego
1st GMAT attemp: 410 (Q18 V27)
2nd GMAT attemp: 490 (Q35 V23)
1st GMAT attemp: 410 (Q18 V27)
2nd GMAT attemp: 490 (Q35 V23)
GMAT/MBA Expert
-
[email protected]
- Elite Legendary Member
- Posts: 10392
- Joined: Sun Jun 23, 2013 6:38 pm
- Location: Palo Alto, CA
- Thanked: 2867 times
- Followed by:511 members
- GMAT Score:800
Hi Diego,
You're asking about 'order of operations', which is sometimes referred to as PEMDAS. It's the 'order' in which you have to perform a calculation:
Parentheses
------
Exponents
------
Multiplication
Division
-----
Addition
Subtraction
You perform any calculation in a parentheses first, then any calculation involving an exponent. From there, multiplication and division are on the same 'level', so you do them from 'left to right' through the calculation. Finally, addition and subtraction are on the same 'level', and you do them last (from left to right through the calculation).
When dealing with negative numbers and exponents, you have to be very careful about whether you're dealing with parentheses or not...
(-2)^2 = (-2)(-2) = +4
-2^2 = (-1)(2)(2) = -4
GMAT assassins aren't born, they're made,
Rich
You're asking about 'order of operations', which is sometimes referred to as PEMDAS. It's the 'order' in which you have to perform a calculation:
Parentheses
------
Exponents
------
Multiplication
Division
-----
Addition
Subtraction
You perform any calculation in a parentheses first, then any calculation involving an exponent. From there, multiplication and division are on the same 'level', so you do them from 'left to right' through the calculation. Finally, addition and subtraction are on the same 'level', and you do them last (from left to right through the calculation).
When dealing with negative numbers and exponents, you have to be very careful about whether you're dealing with parentheses or not...
(-2)^2 = (-2)(-2) = +4
-2^2 = (-1)(2)(2) = -4
GMAT assassins aren't born, they're made,
Rich
