I came across this question and the choices I have to choose between are B and D. Now How do I choose between these two choices???
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
During the period in which there are no competitive races, two runners--Runners A and Runners B--take part in an experiment measuring their VO2 max, the volume of oxygen an athlete can use. During these sessions, the runners engaged in moderate aerobic activity, or a sustained heart rate between 146-154 beats per minute. At the end of the sessions, Runner A had a greater VO2 max than Runner B. Therefore, once the two runners begin identical intensive training--sessions involving over 168 beats per minute-- for the race season, Runner A will continue to have the greater VO2 max, assuming that neither become injured and that both train with similar intensity
A) Runner A and Runner B had similar VO2 maxes uponentering the study.
B) Regarding their VO2 maxes, runners respond equally to intensive training.
C) Intensive training involves sessions in which athletes maintain a heartbeat over 168 beats per minute.
D) The amount one trains does not influence one's VO2 max.
E) During the experiment, Runner A did not always have the greater VO2 max than Runner B.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
A Tough CR Question: Choices seem pretty similar
This topic has expert replies
- VivianKerr
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 1035
- Joined: Fri Dec 17, 2010 11:13 am
- Location: Los Angeles, CA
- Thanked: 474 times
- Followed by:365 members
What is the actual question-stem? Can you double-check the phrasing of the question. I can't tell what it's asking.
Vivian Kerr
GMAT Rockstar, Tutor
https://www.GMATrockstar.com
https://www.yelp.com/biz/gmat-rockstar-los-angeles
Former Kaplan and Grockit instructor, freelance GMAT content creator, now offering affordable, effective, Skype-tutoring for the GMAT at $150/hr. Contact: [email protected]
Thank you for all the "thanks" and "follows"!
GMAT Rockstar, Tutor
https://www.GMATrockstar.com
https://www.yelp.com/biz/gmat-rockstar-los-angeles
Former Kaplan and Grockit instructor, freelance GMAT content creator, now offering affordable, effective, Skype-tutoring for the GMAT at $150/hr. Contact: [email protected]
Thank you for all the "thanks" and "follows"!
- VivianKerr
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 1035
- Joined: Fri Dec 17, 2010 11:13 am
- Location: Los Angeles, CA
- Thanked: 474 times
- Followed by:365 members
That's the problem -- it's not asking anything. There's no "question" at the end of the paragraph.
If it was a fill in the blank, then the answer choices would make a complete sentence with the last sentence of the passage, but they don't.
Here's the complete last sentence:
Therefore, once the two runners begin identical intensive training--sessions involving over 168 beats per minute-- for the race season, Runner A will continue to have the greater VO2 max, assuming that neither become injured and that both train with similar intensity
Here's a truncated version:
Therefore, Runner A will have greater VO2 max, assuming that X and that Y.
It's a statement.
If we tried to add an answer choice to the end, notice how it makes no sense:
Therefore, Runner A will have greater VO2 max, assuming that X and that Y Runner A and Runner B had similar VO2 maxes uponentering the study.
This is a run-on sentence and is illogical. Something is missing from this question, or this is an incredibly poor formatting job from Magoosh. Magoosh makes pretty good material, so I find this really odd. I'm recommend you DM a Magoosh tutor. There is no "question" to this question, and it is profoundly unlike most GMAT CR.
If it was a fill in the blank, then the answer choices would make a complete sentence with the last sentence of the passage, but they don't.
Here's the complete last sentence:
Therefore, once the two runners begin identical intensive training--sessions involving over 168 beats per minute-- for the race season, Runner A will continue to have the greater VO2 max, assuming that neither become injured and that both train with similar intensity
Here's a truncated version:
Therefore, Runner A will have greater VO2 max, assuming that X and that Y.
It's a statement.
If we tried to add an answer choice to the end, notice how it makes no sense:
Therefore, Runner A will have greater VO2 max, assuming that X and that Y Runner A and Runner B had similar VO2 maxes uponentering the study.
This is a run-on sentence and is illogical. Something is missing from this question, or this is an incredibly poor formatting job from Magoosh. Magoosh makes pretty good material, so I find this really odd. I'm recommend you DM a Magoosh tutor. There is no "question" to this question, and it is profoundly unlike most GMAT CR.
Vivian Kerr
GMAT Rockstar, Tutor
https://www.GMATrockstar.com
https://www.yelp.com/biz/gmat-rockstar-los-angeles
Former Kaplan and Grockit instructor, freelance GMAT content creator, now offering affordable, effective, Skype-tutoring for the GMAT at $150/hr. Contact: [email protected]
Thank you for all the "thanks" and "follows"!
GMAT Rockstar, Tutor
https://www.GMATrockstar.com
https://www.yelp.com/biz/gmat-rockstar-los-angeles
Former Kaplan and Grockit instructor, freelance GMAT content creator, now offering affordable, effective, Skype-tutoring for the GMAT at $150/hr. Contact: [email protected]
Thank you for all the "thanks" and "follows"!
Hi,VivianKerr wrote:That's the problem -- it's not asking anything. There's no "question" at the end of the paragraph.
If it was a fill in the blank, then the answer choices would make a complete sentence with the last sentence of the passage, but they don't.
Here's the complete last sentence:
Therefore, once the two runners begin identical intensive training--sessions involving over 168 beats per minute-- for the race season, Runner A will continue to have the greater VO2 max, assuming that neither become injured and that both train with similar intensity
Here's a truncated version:
Therefore, Runner A will have greater VO2 max, assuming that X and that Y.
It's a statement.
If we tried to add an answer choice to the end, notice how it makes no sense:
Therefore, Runner A will have greater VO2 max, assuming that X and that Y Runner A and Runner B had similar VO2 maxes uponentering the study.
This is a run-on sentence and is illogical. Something is missing from this question, or this is an incredibly poor formatting job from Magoosh. Magoosh makes pretty good material, so I find this really odd. I'm recommend you DM a Magoosh tutor. There is no "question" to this question, and it is profoundly unlike most GMAT CR.
following is the complete question
During the period in which there are no competitive races, two runners--Runners A and Runners B--take part in an experiment measuring their VO2 max, the volume of oxygen an athlete can use. During these sessions, the runners engaged in moderate aerobic activity, or a sustained heart rate between 146-154 beats per minute. At the end of the sessions, Runner A had a greater VO2 max than Runner B. Therefore, once the two runners begin identical intensive training--sessions involving over 168 beats per minute-- for the race season, Runner A will continue to have the greater VO2 max, assuming that neither become injured and that both train with similar intensity.
Which of the following is an assumption upon which the argument rests?
A-runner A and Runner B had similar VO2 maxes uponentering the study.
B-Regarding their VO2 maxes, runners respond equally to intensive training.
C-Intensive training involves sessions in which athletes maintain a heartbeat over 168 beats per minute.
D-The amount one trains does not influence one's VO2 max.
E-During the experiment, Runner A did not always have the greater VO2 max than Runner B.
GMAT/MBA Expert
- Ian Stewart
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 2621
- Joined: Mon Jun 02, 2008 3:17 am
- Location: Montreal
- Thanked: 1090 times
- Followed by:355 members
- GMAT Score:780
The argument is essentially:
"¢Â A has better VO2-max than B after moderate activity
"¢Â So A will have better VO2-max than B after intensive activity
We're comparing two different situations - moderate activity and intensive activity. We're assuming the comparison in the first situation will still hold in the second, or in other words we're assuming that if someone has better VO2 in moderate training, he or she will continue to have better VO2 in intensive training.
None of the answers says that exactly. Answer B is the only one that's close to being right, so I assume it's the "OA", but it's not a correct answer either. Answer B is incorrect, because it says "runners respond equally to intensive training". If something is an assumption, it needs to be true for the argument to hold. And we don't need to assume they respond equally to intensive training for the argument to be true. The argument is still true if high-VO2 runners in moderate training respond better than low-VO2 runners to intensive training.
Really the question ought to ask something more like "the argument above is logically sound if which of the following is true?", which is not the same as asking for an "assumption".
"¢Â A has better VO2-max than B after moderate activity
"¢Â So A will have better VO2-max than B after intensive activity
We're comparing two different situations - moderate activity and intensive activity. We're assuming the comparison in the first situation will still hold in the second, or in other words we're assuming that if someone has better VO2 in moderate training, he or she will continue to have better VO2 in intensive training.
None of the answers says that exactly. Answer B is the only one that's close to being right, so I assume it's the "OA", but it's not a correct answer either. Answer B is incorrect, because it says "runners respond equally to intensive training". If something is an assumption, it needs to be true for the argument to hold. And we don't need to assume they respond equally to intensive training for the argument to be true. The argument is still true if high-VO2 runners in moderate training respond better than low-VO2 runners to intensive training.
Really the question ought to ask something more like "the argument above is logically sound if which of the following is true?", which is not the same as asking for an "assumption".
For online GMAT math tutoring, or to buy my higher-level Quant books and problem sets, contact me at ianstewartgmat at gmail.com
ianstewartgmat.com
ianstewartgmat.com