| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
airan Really wants to Beat The GMAT!

Joined: 13 May 2008 Posts: 126
Thanks given: 0 Thanked 2 times in 2 posts
Target GMAT Score: 750 GMAT Score: 710
|
Posted: Sun Jul 06, 2008 12:09 am Post subject: A play was performed as a part of the benefit for a char |
|
|
A play was performed as a part of the benefit for a charity. Nobody who wanted to buy tickets to the benefit had ever seen the play performed before. Because of the high demand, only the people who had never seen the play before were allowed to buy the tickets for the benefit. Therefore, everyone who wanted to buy the tickets for the benefit was able to do so.
In order for this argument to be logically correct, it must also be true that
1. The people planning the benefit wanted to expose the play to new audiences
2. The play was not performed in small theater with few seats.
3. everyone who wanted to buy a ticket believed in the cause for which benefit was held.
4. there was no limit to the number of tickets available
5. everyone who was unable to buy ticket did not want to buy one
Source Kaplan _________________ Thanks
Airan |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
Anon Just gettin' started!
Joined: 28 Apr 2008 Posts: 27
Thanks given: 0 Thanked 1 times in 1 posts
|
Posted: Sun Jul 06, 2008 1:04 am Post subject: Re: A play was performed as a part of the benefit for a char |
|
|
4. there was no limit to the number of tickets available
By POE...only 1 left...please post OA |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
raunekk GMAT Destroyer!
Joined: 16 Apr 2008 Posts: 526
Thanks given: 10 Thanked 20 times in 20 posts
Target GMAT Score: 740
|
Posted: Sun Jul 06, 2008 3:44 am Post subject: |
|
|
thats confusing:)
I will go with E too..Rest all doesnt make sense(atleast to me )
OA??
Anon ,can u explain me how u used POE method in this question!!
thx |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Anon Just gettin' started!
Joined: 28 Apr 2008 Posts: 27
Thanks given: 0 Thanked 1 times in 1 posts
|
Posted: Sun Jul 06, 2008 4:31 am Post subject: |
|
|
argument to be logically correct
so the answer should contribute logically...
1. The people planning the benefit wanted to expose the play to new audiences
No
2. The play was not performed in small theater with few seats.
No
3. everyone who wanted to buy a ticket believed in the cause for which benefit was held.
No
4. there was no limit to the number of tickets available
5. everyone who was unable to buy ticket did not want to buy one
confused with 4 and 5 ---
yeah..to think of it..5 makes more sense...
not sure  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
nitin86 Rising GMAT Star
Joined: 02 Sep 2007 Posts: 66
Thanks given: 0 Thanked 0 times in 0 posts
|
Posted: Sun Jul 06, 2008 7:29 am Post subject: Re: A play was performed as a part of the benefit for a char |
|
|
| airan wrote: | A play was performed as a part of the benefit for a charity. Nobody who wanted to buy tickets to the benefit had ever seen the play performed before. Because of the high demand, only the people who had never seen the play before were allowed to buy the tickets for the benefit. Therefore, everyone who wanted to buy the tickets for the benefit was able to do so.
In order for this argument to be logically correct, it must also be true that
1. The people planning the benefit wanted to expose the play to new audiences
2. The play was not performed in small theater with few seats.
3. everyone who wanted to buy a ticket believed in the cause for which benefit was held.
4. there was no limit to the number of tickets available
5. everyone who was unable to buy ticket did not want to buy one
Source Kaplan |
There are 2 points to be noticed in the argument...
1) "NOBODY who wanted to buy tickets to the benefit had ever seen the play performed before"
Therefore, ALL the people who wanted to buy tickets to the benefits, had not seen the play before....
2) Conclusion is -> "Therefore, EVERYONE who wanted to buy the tickets for the benefit was able to do so"
The conclusion is possible with the given conditions, only when D is true..there are unlimited tickets..."for the people who have not seen the play before"
it is important to note, the unlimited tickets was applied only for the people who had not seen the play...people who had already seen the play..were already eliminated in the argument by "Because of the high demand, only the people who had never seen the play before were allowed to buy the tickets...."
i.e They were not allowed to buy the tickets.... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
airan Really wants to Beat The GMAT!

Joined: 13 May 2008 Posts: 126
Thanks given: 0 Thanked 2 times in 2 posts
Target GMAT Score: 750 GMAT Score: 710
|
Posted: Mon Jul 07, 2008 7:05 am Post subject: |
|
|
OA is 5 _________________ Thanks
Airan |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
sumant1808 Just gettin' started!
Joined: 05 May 2008 Posts: 15
Thanks given: 0 Thanked 0 times in 0 posts
Test Date: 6th August Target GMAT Score: 750
|
Posted: Tue Jul 15, 2008 12:05 am Post subject: Re: A play was performed as a part of the benefit for a char |
|
|
1. The people planning the benefit wanted to expose the play to new audiences
Because of high demand
2. The play was not performed in small theater with few seats.
Out of scope
3. everyone who wanted to buy a ticket believed in the cause for which benefit was held.
don't want to infer too much
4. there was no limit to the number of tickets available
don't want to infer too much,extreme choice
5. everyone who was unable to buy ticket did not want to buy one
This can be the only reason as per the stimulus, as people who wanted to buy the tickets had seen the show
IMO 5 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|