• Magoosh
Study with Magoosh GMAT prep

Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

• Free Veritas GMAT Class
Experience Lesson 1 Live Free

Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

• 5-Day Free Trial
5-day free, full-access trial TTP Quant

Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

• Free Practice Test & Review
How would you score if you took the GMAT

Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

• Award-winning private GMAT tutoring
Register now and save up to $200 Available with Beat the GMAT members only code • Get 300+ Practice Questions 25 Video lessons and 6 Webinars for FREE Available with Beat the GMAT members only code • Free Trial & Practice Exam BEAT THE GMAT EXCLUSIVE Available with Beat the GMAT members only code • 5 Day FREE Trial Study Smarter, Not Harder Available with Beat the GMAT members only code • 1 Hour Free BEAT THE GMAT EXCLUSIVE Available with Beat the GMAT members only code ## A marketing expert This topic has 1 expert reply and 0 member replies ### Top Member lheiannie07 Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts Joined 07 Sep 2017 Posted: 299 messages Followed by: 1 members #### A marketing expert Sun Sep 10, 2017 2:13 pm A marketing expert, consulted by the management of a major fashion brand, suggested that the use of an internationally famous sports professional as a model in the clothing company's upcoming advertising campaign would spur public interest and, consequently, increase sales. A significant implication of such a decision would be the conscious or unconscious association of the sports professional's personality with the fashion brand, as seen by the consumers. The management of the fashion brand would be ill-advised to employ the sports professional, however, as a poll conducted amongst the region's top sports analysts reveals that the team for which the sports professional in question plays is not likely to have success in the upcoming season. In the argument given, the two portions in boldface play which of the following roles? (A) The first is a proposed plan of action supported by the position defended in the argument; the second is an opinion that supports that position. (B) The first is a suggestion of a potential cause-and-effect relationship; the second is evidence that disproves the accuracy of that suggestion. (C) The first is a claim, the accuracy of which is criticized by the argument's position; the second is a judgment offered as support for that position. (D) The first identifies the primary logic that forms the basis of the argument's position; the second challenges that logic. (E) The first is a theory that forms the basis of a certain strategy; the second is an explanation for why that theory is correct. Why isn't options A and D? Any experts advice on this? OA C Need free GMAT or MBA advice from an expert? Register for Beat The GMAT now and post your question in these forums! ### GMAT/MBA Expert DavidG@VeritasPrep Legendary Member Joined 14 Jan 2015 Posted: 2457 messages Followed by: 115 members Upvotes: 1153 GMAT Score: 770 Top Reply Tue Sep 12, 2017 9:00 am lheiannie07 wrote: A marketing expert, consulted by the management of a major fashion brand, suggested that the use of an internationally famous sports professional as a model in the clothing company's upcoming advertising campaign would spur public interest and, consequently, increase sales. A significant implication of such a decision would be the conscious or unconscious association of the sports professional's personality with the fashion brand, as seen by the consumers. The management of the fashion brand would be ill-advised to employ the sports professional, however, as a poll conducted amongst the region's top sports analysts reveals that the team for which the sports professional in question plays is not likely to have success in the upcoming season. In the argument given, the two portions in boldface play which of the following roles? (A) The first is a proposed plan of action supported by the position defended in the argument; the second is an opinion that supports that position. (B) The first is a suggestion of a potential cause-and-effect relationship; the second is evidence that disproves the accuracy of that suggestion. (C) The first is a claim, the accuracy of which is criticized by the argument's position; the second is a judgment offered as support for that position. (D) The first identifies the primary logic that forms the basis of the argument's position; the second challenges that logic. (E) The first is a theory that forms the basis of a certain strategy; the second is an explanation for why that theory is correct. Why isn't options A and D? Any experts advice on this? OA C Do you mind reposting this with the bolded portions bolded? _________________ Veritas Prep | GMAT Instructor Veritas Prep Reviews Save$100 off any live Veritas Prep GMAT Course

Thanked by: lheiannie07
Enroll in a Veritas Prep GMAT class completely for FREE. Wondering if a GMAT course is right for you? Attend the first class session of an actual GMAT course, either in-person or live online, and see for yourself why so many students choose to work with Veritas Prep. Find a class now!

### Best Conversation Starters

1 lheiannie07 112 topics
2 swerve 64 topics
3 LUANDATO 64 topics
4 ardz24 61 topics
5 AAPL 57 topics
See More Top Beat The GMAT Members...

### Most Active Experts

1 Scott@TargetTestPrep

Target Test Prep

227 posts
2 Brent@GMATPrepNow

GMAT Prep Now Teacher

176 posts
3 Jeff@TargetTestPrep

Target Test Prep

168 posts
4 Rich.C@EMPOWERgma...

EMPOWERgmat

138 posts
5 GMATGuruNY

The Princeton Review Teacher

129 posts
See More Top Beat The GMAT Experts