Welcome to Beat The GMAT, the world's largest GMAT & MBA forum. Please join our rich community of friendly members. Get free help from
experts who teach at the leading GMAT & MBA prep companies — Kaplan, Veritas Prep, Manhattan GMAT and Stacy Blackman Consulting.

Announcement: Apply for the Beat The GMAT/Veritas Prep MBA Fast Track Scholarship, featuring $20,000 in prizes.

700-800 Level Question: Try it yourself!

Goto page Previous  1, 2
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Beat The GMAT Forum Index -> GMAT Verbal & Essays -> Critical Reasoning
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
bluementor
Rising GMAT Star


Joined: 11 Jun 2008
Posts: 37

Thanks given: 0
Thanked 0 times in 0 posts


PostPosted: Wed Jun 18, 2008 1:45 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
We need to support analyst's assertion, not company's


Durgesh79,

I'm all clear now. I've been looking at things through the company's eyes all this while.

Thanks a lot man!

BlueMentor
Back to top


View user's profile Send private message
airan
Really wants to Beat The GMAT!


Joined: 13 May 2008
Posts: 126

Thanks given: 0
Thanked 2 times in 2 posts


Target GMAT Score: 750
GMAT Score: 710

PostPosted: Wed Jun 18, 2008 7:32 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

My Choice is E( was confused between E and B) , Now Analyst's assertion can be supported if introduction of new devices hampers the sale of existing devices( i.e. consumers buying new devices more). E supports it by saying that consumers are loyal to tech they are enjoying( making it successful) so they will tend to buy new device.

Why no B , because Analyst's assertion is sales getting hurt with new device, not that media and news papers are hurting the sales by publishing new device.

_________________
Thanks
Airan
Back to top


View user's profile Send private message
durgesh79
Really wants to Beat The GMAT!


Joined: 22 Apr 2008
Posts: 168

Thanks given: 5
Thanked 12 times in 10 posts


PostPosted: Wed Jun 18, 2008 10:43 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

airan wrote:
My Choice is E( was confused between E and B) , Now Analyst's assertion can be supported if introduction of new devices hampers the sale of existing devices( i.e. consumers buying new devices more). E supports it by saying that consumers are loyal to tech they are enjoying( making it successful) so they will tend to buy new device.

Why no B , because Analyst's assertion is sales getting hurt with new device, not that media and news papers are hurting the sales by publishing new device.


Airan : Analyst's assertion is "salse are going down becuase of announcement of launch new device, not becuase of new device. So if a company says in a press release that in next Nov 2008, they are going to launch a new series of laptops. The news may not even go to consumers unless media highlights it......
Back to top


View user's profile Send private message
v1shwanath
Just gettin' started!


Joined: 17 Jun 2008
Posts: 14

Thanks given: 0
Thanked 0 times in 0 posts


PostPosted: Fri Jun 20, 2008 1:01 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

firstly i cant figure out which is the analyst's assertion here:
"But announcing new technology too soon after the introduction of a successful device can backfire. Once consumers hear about the new device, they may stop buying the one currently on sale"
or
"So, if a company wishes to announce the upcoming sale of a new device, it should wait until purchases of the old device have begun to decline. "

is the 2nd statement a conclusion and therefore not an assertion?

Regarding the statement:

" But announcing new technology too soon after the introduction of a successful device can backfire."

answer B) says "Media outlets, such as television programs and magazines, often report on the planned introduction of new devices while the sales of old devices are still strong"

answer B) does not say that media makes these announcements too soon. it just says that the media makes the announcement while the sales of the old model are still strong.
isnt it possible that the sales are strong even after 2 years. so if a media reports about a new model after 2 years, then it is not too soon. or is my presumption wrong ?
is it that 'too soon' is relative to the sales..i.e any time period when the sales is strong is 'too soon' after the product has been introduced, and once the sales start slowing down, the 'too soon ' period is over.

Also the assertion being made is that media announcements are detrimental to sales of existing models.
the assertion talks about the timing of the announcement by the media and how its detrimental.
how does answer B) support this assertion? It just states that the media makes these announcements while sales are still strong.
i.e it talks about the timing of the announcement but does not necessarily say that its detrimental.
Back to top


View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Beat The GMAT Forum Index -> GMAT Verbal & Essays -> Critical Reasoning All times are GMT - 7 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2
Page 2 of 2

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum



"GMAT" and other GMAC™ trademarks are registered trademarks of the Graduate Management Admission Council™. The Graduate Management Admission Council™ does not endorse, nor is it affiliated in any way with the owner or any content on this website. The opinions expressed here are solely those of the author or those of the members of this website. Copyright © 2008 BTG Test Prep, LLC. Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group.