• Award-winning private GMAT tutoring
Register now and save up to \$200

Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

• Get 300+ Practice Questions

Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

• 5 Day FREE Trial
Study Smarter, Not Harder

Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

• Free Practice Test & Review
How would you score if you took the GMAT

Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

• 1 Hour Free
BEAT THE GMAT EXCLUSIVE

Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

• Free Trial & Practice Exam
BEAT THE GMAT EXCLUSIVE

Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

• 5-Day Free Trial
5-day free, full-access trial TTP Quant

Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

• Free Veritas GMAT Class
Experience Lesson 1 Live Free

Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

• Magoosh
Study with Magoosh GMAT prep

Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

## 500 ds test6 #21

This topic has 2 member replies
dunkin77 Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Joined
01 Apr 2007
Posted:
269 messages

#### 500 ds test6 #21

Sat Apr 07, 2007 8:32 pm
Hi,

I thought the answer is C) but correct answer is E). I thought if we can varify that Z is positive by (1), r ans k are also positive in order by (2)....Can anyone please explain?

Are the numbers k/4,z/3 and r/2 in increasing order?
(1) 3 < z < 4
(2) r < z < k

Need free GMAT or MBA advice from an expert? Register for Beat The GMAT now and post your question in these forums!
dunkin77 Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Joined
01 Apr 2007
Posted:
269 messages
Sun Apr 08, 2007 9:51 am
you are right.

even though Z, K are positive, r can be positive or negative. So, E) is right.

gabriel Legendary Member
Joined
20 Dec 2006
Posted:
986 messages
Followed by:
1 members
51
Sun Apr 08, 2007 9:43 am
dunkin77 wrote:
Hi,

I thought the answer is C) but correct answer is E). I thought if we can varify that Z is positive by (1), r ans k are also positive in order by (2)....Can anyone please explain?

Are the numbers k/4,z/3 and r/2 in increasing order?
(1) 3 < z < 4
(2) r < z < k
with first statemnet we can say that z/3 is > 1 .. bcoz z is > 3 .. but it does not say anything abt r and k so insufficient ..

with the sceond statemnet we do not know the value of r,z,k .. nor do we know wether they are positive or negative so insufficinet

when we combine them... we know that z > 3 and that k is > z .. but we styill wont be able to say wether k/4 > or < than z/3 ..for eg .. let z = 3.1 and let k=3.2 which is > z but in this case z/3 is > k.4 ... now consider z = 3.1 and k = 10 (k > z ) .. in this case k/4 > z/3 so we wont get a defnite answer ... also r can be negative or postive .. so combinig the 2 statments will not help either so answer is E ....

### Best Conversation Starters

1 lheiannie07 116 topics
2 LUANDATO 67 topics
3 swerve 66 topics
4 ardz24 61 topics
5 AAPL 59 topics
See More Top Beat The GMAT Members...

### Most Active Experts

1 Scott@TargetTestPrep

Target Test Prep

213 posts
2 Brent@GMATPrepNow

GMAT Prep Now Teacher

177 posts
3 Jeff@TargetTestPrep

Target Test Prep

168 posts
4 Rich.C@EMPOWERgma...

EMPOWERgmat

133 posts
5 GMATGuruNY

The Princeton Review Teacher

126 posts
See More Top Beat The GMAT Experts