• Free Trial & Practice Exam
BEAT THE GMAT EXCLUSIVE

Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

• Get 300+ Practice Questions

Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

• 5 Day FREE Trial
Study Smarter, Not Harder

Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

• Free Veritas GMAT Class
Experience Lesson 1 Live Free

Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

• Free Practice Test & Review
How would you score if you took the GMAT

Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

• Magoosh
Study with Magoosh GMAT prep

Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

• Award-winning private GMAT tutoring
Register now and save up to $200 Available with Beat the GMAT members only code • 5-Day Free Trial 5-day free, full-access trial TTP Quant Available with Beat the GMAT members only code • 1 Hour Free BEAT THE GMAT EXCLUSIVE Available with Beat the GMAT members only code ## 2016 GMAT OG :Neuroscientist: Memory evolved to help animals tagged by: ceilidh.erickson This topic has 3 expert replies and 1 member reply NandishSS Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts Joined 05 Jun 2015 Posted: 300 messages Followed by: 1 members Thanked: 3 times #### 2016 GMAT OG :Neuroscientist: Memory evolved to help animals Sun Feb 12, 2017 8:40 pm Elapsed Time: 00:00 • Lap #[LAPCOUNT] ([LAPTIME]) Neuroscientist: Memory evolved to help animals react appropriately to situations they encounter by drawing on the past experience of similar situations. But this does not require that animals perfectly recall every detail of all their experiences. Instead, to function well, memory should generalize from past experiences that are similar to the current one. The neuroscientist's statements, if true, most strongly support which of the following conclusions? (A)At least some animals perfectly recall every detail of at least some past experiences. (B)Perfectly recalling every detail of all their past experiences could help at least some animals react more appropriately than they otherwise would to new situations they encounter. (C)Generalizing from past experiences requires clear memories of most if not all the details of those experiences. (D)Recalling every detail of all past experiences would be incompatible with any ability to generalize from those experiences. (E)Animals can often react more appropriately than they otherwise would to situations they encounter if they draw on generalizations from past experiences of similar situations. OA:E Need free GMAT or MBA advice from an expert? Register for Beat The GMAT now and post your question in these forums! ### GMAT/MBA Expert DavidG@VeritasPrep Legendary Member Joined 14 Jan 2015 Posted: 2447 messages Followed by: 115 members Thanked: 1153 times GMAT Score: 770 Mon Feb 13, 2017 4:16 am NandishSS wrote: Neuroscientist: Memory evolved to help animals react appropriately to situations they encounter by drawing on the past experience of similar situations. But this does not require that animals perfectly recall every detail of all their experiences. Instead, to function well, memory should generalize from past experiences that are similar to the current one. The neuroscientist's statements, if true, most strongly support which of the following conclusions? (A)At least some animals perfectly recall every detail of at least some past experiences. (B)Perfectly recalling every detail of all their past experiences could help at least some animals react more appropriately than they otherwise would to new situations they encounter. (C)Generalizing from past experiences requires clear memories of most if not all the details of those experiences. (D)Recalling every detail of all past experiences would be incompatible with any ability to generalize from those experiences. (E)Animals can often react more appropriately than they otherwise would to situations they encounter if they draw on generalizations from past experiences of similar situations. OA:E We've got an inference question, so let's summarize the facts we'll be deriving this inference from: - Memory evolved to help animals react appropriately to similar situations they've previously encountered - Animals don't need to remember every detail - memory should generalize from past experience Based on the above, what can we conclude? A) nope. The prompt states explicitly that perfect recall isn't necessary. It certainly doesn't suggest that some animals have it. B) nope. Again, perfect recall isn't the point. Generalization is. C) nope. The prompt never goes into how much an animal must remember to form this generalization. No reason to believe it needs to remember most of the details of an experience to generalize from it. D) nope. Though animals don't require perfect recall, there's no reason to believe that perfect recall would prevent generalization. E) Looks good. If animals didn't react more appropriately when they drew on generalizations, how could doing so be considered helpful? The whole point of the passage is that generalizing from past experience will help an animal make better decisions when it encounters a similar situation. E is the answer. _________________ Veritas Prep | GMAT Instructor Veritas Prep Reviews Save$100 off any live Veritas Prep GMAT Course

Thanked by: NandishSS, gmatdestroyer13
Enroll in a Veritas Prep GMAT class completely for FREE. Wondering if a GMAT course is right for you? Attend the first class session of an actual GMAT course, either in-person or live online, and see for yourself why so many students choose to work with Veritas Prep. Find a class now!

### GMAT/MBA Expert

GMATGuruNY GMAT Instructor
Joined
25 May 2010
Posted:
13584 messages
Followed by:
1796 members
Thanked:
13052 times
GMAT Score:
790
Tue Feb 14, 2017 4:46 am
NandishSS wrote:
Neuroscientist: Memory evolved to help animals react appropriately to situations they encounter by drawing on the past experience of similar situations. But this does not require that animals perfectly recall every detail of all their experiences. Instead, to function well, memory should generalize from past experiences that are similar to the current one.

The neuroscientist's statements, if true, most strongly support which of the following conclusions?

(A)At least some animals perfectly recall every detail of at least some past experiences.
(B)Perfectly recalling every detail of all their past experiences could help at least some animals react more appropriately than they otherwise would to new situations they encounter.
(C)Generalizing from past experiences requires clear memories of most if not all the details of those experiences.
(D)Recalling every detail of all past experiences would be incompatible with any ability to generalize from those experiences.
(E)Animals can often react more appropriately than they otherwise would to situations they encounter if they draw on generalizations from past experiences of similar situations.

An alternate approach is to apply the NEGATION TEST.
When the correct answer choice is negated, the passage will be CONTRADICTED.

E, negated:
Animals rarely react more appropriately if they draw on generalizations from past experiences.
This negation contradicts the passage's contention that memory should generalize from past experiences.
Since the negation of E contradicts the passage, E is a valid inference: a statement that MUST BE TRUE, given the information in the passage.

The other options, negated:

(A) No animals perfectly recall every detail.
This negation does not contradict the passage, which offers no information about the proportion of animals able to recall every detail.

(B) Perfectly recalling every detail would not help any animals.
This negation confirms the passage's contention that animals do not need to remember every detail of past experiences.

C) Generalizing from past experiences does not require clear memories of all the details.
This negation confirms the passage's contention that animals do not need to remember every detail of past experiences.

(D) Recalling every detail of all past experiences would be compatible with an ability to generalize.
This negation does not contradict the passage, which states only that recalling every detail is not required.

Since none of these negations contradicts the passage, eliminate A, B, C and D.

_________________
Mitch Hunt
GMAT Private Tutor
GMATGuruNY@gmail.com
If you find one of my posts helpful, please take a moment to click on the "Thank" icon.
Available for tutoring in NYC and long-distance.

Free GMAT Practice Test How can you improve your test score if you don't know your baseline score? Take a free online practice exam. Get started on achieving your dream score today! Sign up now.
rsarashi Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Joined
24 Dec 2016
Posted:
186 messages
Followed by:
2 members
Thanked:
5 times
Sat Jun 10, 2017 11:20 pm
Quote:
An alternate approach is to apply the NEGATION TEST.
When the correct answer choice is negated, the passage will be CONTRADICTED.

E, negated:
Animals rarely react more appropriately if they draw on generalizations from past experiences.
This negation contradicts the passage's contention that memory should generalize from past experiences.
Since the negation of E contradicts the passage, E is a valid inference: a statement that MUST BE TRUE, given the information in the passage.

The other options, negated:

(A) No animals perfectly recall every detail.
This negation does not contradict the passage, which offers no information about the proportion of animals able to recall every detail.

(B) Perfectly recalling every detail would not help any animals.
This negation confirms the passage's contention that animals do not need to remember every detail of past experiences.

C) Generalizing from past experiences does not require clear memories of all the details.
This negation confirms the passage's contention that animals do not need to remember every detail of past experiences.

(D) Recalling every detail of all past experiences would be compatible with an ability to generalize.
This negation does not contradict the passage, which states only that recalling every detail is not required.

Since none of these negations contradicts the passage, eliminate A, B, C and D.
[/quote]Hi GMATGuruNY ,

Can we solve inference question by negating method?

Thanks

### GMAT/MBA Expert

ceilidh.erickson GMAT Instructor
Joined
04 Dec 2012
Posted:
1696 messages
Followed by:
224 members
Thanked:
1443 times
Sun Jun 11, 2017 3:08 pm
rsarashi wrote:
Can we solve inference question by negating method?

Thanks
Another way of thinking about "what can be inferred/concluded" is "what must be true, based on the above?" As such, we can approach the answer choices by asking, "does this statement HAVE to be true?" Eliminate any for which you'd respond "maybe, but there might be cases when it's not true."

This is a slightly different - but related - thought process from the NEGATION test that we use on FIND ASSUMPTION questions. For those, we ask "if the opposite of this thing were true, would it undermine the argument?"

For inference questions, I generally ask myself "is there a way for this thing NOT to be true, and still be consistent with the given information?"

Did that help?

_________________

Ceilidh Erickson
Manhattan Prep GMAT & GRE instructor
EdM in Mind, Brain, and Education

Manhattan Prep instructors all have 99th+ percentile scores and expert teaching experience.
Sign up for a FREE TRIAL, and learn why we have the highest ratings in the GMAT industry!

Thanked by: rsarashi, gmatdestroyer13
Free Manhattan Prep online events - The first class of every online Manhattan Prep course is free. Classes start every week.

### Best Conversation Starters

1 lheiannie07 111 topics
2 ardz24 64 topics
3 LUANDATO 62 topics
4 swerve 60 topics
5 AAPL 57 topics
See More Top Beat The GMAT Members...

### Most Active Experts

1 Brent@GMATPrepNow

GMAT Prep Now Teacher

160 posts
2 EconomistGMATTutor

The Economist GMAT Tutor

130 posts
3 Rich.C@EMPOWERgma...

EMPOWERgmat

122 posts
4 GMATGuruNY

The Princeton Review Teacher

122 posts
5 Scott@TargetTestPrep

Target Test Prep

118 posts
See More Top Beat The GMAT Experts