1000Cr-->Lsat 25-->SecIV-->Q22

[This topic has 1 member reply]
Free $100 Amazon.com Gift Card - Buy a GMAT course using a Beat The GMAT discount code between Mar 8-22 and get a $100 Amazon.com Gift Card. Learn more!
Post New Topic   Post Reply

nishant_1010
Just gettin' started!

Default Avatar

Joined: 06 Jan 2007
Posts: 14

Thanks given: 0
Thanked 0 times in 0 posts

Topic: 1000Cr-->Lsat 25-->SecIV-->Q22
PostWed May 02, 2007 10:18 pm

Elapsed Time:
00:00
Lap   Why a timer is critical to improving your score

22. Dinosaur expert: Some paleontologists have claimed that birds are descendants of
a group of dinosaurs called dromeosaurs. They appeal to the fossil record, which indicates that dromeosaurs have characteristics more similar to birds than do most
dinosaurs. But there is a fatal flaw in their argument; the earliest bird fossils that
have been discovered date back tens of millions of years farther than the oldest
known dromeosaur fossils. Thus the paleontologists' claim is false.
The expert's argument depends on assuming which one of the following?
(A) Having similar characteristics is not a sign that types of animals are
evolutionarily related.
(B) Dromeosaurs and birds could have common ancestors.
(C) Knowledge of dromeosaur fossils and the earliest bird fossils is complete.
(D) Known fossils indicate the relative dates of origin of birds and dromeosaurs.
(E) Dromeosaurs are dissimilar to birds in many significant ways.

Ans D. I chose C why is C wrong and D correct
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
jayhawk2001
Moderator



Joined: 28 Jan 2007
Posts: 789

Thanks given: 0
Thanked 15 times in 14 posts
Location: Silicon valley, California

PostWed May 02, 2007 10:40 pm

nishant_1010 wrote:
22. Dinosaur expert: Some paleontologists have claimed that birds are descendants of
a group of dinosaurs called dromeosaurs. They appeal to the fossil record, which indicates that dromeosaurs have characteristics more similar to birds than do most
dinosaurs. But there is a fatal flaw in their argument; the earliest bird fossils that
have been discovered date back tens of millions of years farther than the oldest
known dromeosaur fossils. Thus the paleontologists' claim is false.
The expert's argument depends on assuming which one of the following?
(A) Having similar characteristics is not a sign that types of animals are
evolutionarily related.
(B) Dromeosaurs and birds could have common ancestors.
(C) Knowledge of dromeosaur fossils and the earliest bird fossils is complete.
(D) Known fossils indicate the relative dates of origin of birds and dromeosaurs.
(E) Dromeosaurs are dissimilar to birds in many significant ways.

Ans D. I chose C why is C wrong and D correct
Someone argues that the expert's claim is incorrect -- his only source
for the argument is that the bird's fossils are much much older than
the dromeo's fossils.

Hence the assumption is that the fossils correctly indicate the dates
of origin. Hence D.

A - The expert doesn't comment on similarities. Rule this one out.

B - No mention of common ancestors. Incorrect

C - We don't need "complete" knowledge. We just need to know if
the dates on the fossils are indicative of the origins

D - correct

E - Out of scope
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   

Post New Topic   Post Reply All times are GMT - 7 Hours
Page 1 of 1
 
Most Active Members in Last 30 Days
1. kstv 322 posts
2. shashank.ism 312 posts
3. harsh.champ 308 posts
4. gmatmachoman 256 posts
5. thephoenix 238 posts
Most Active Experts in Last 30 Days
1. lunarpower
Manhattan GMAT Teacher
97 posts
2. Stuart Kovinsky
Kaplan GMAT Teacher
58 posts
3. Testluv
Kaplan GMAT Teacher
51 posts
4. Lisa Anderson
Stacy Blackman Consulting
49 posts
5. Bryant@VeritasPrep
Veritas Prep
41 posts