• Magoosh
    Magoosh
    Study with Magoosh GMAT prep

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    Magoosh
  • Kaplan Test Prep
    Free Practice Test & Review
    How would you score if you took the GMAT

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    Kaplan Test Prep
  • Veritas Prep
    Free Veritas GMAT Class
    Experience Lesson 1 Live Free

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    Veritas Prep
  • e-gmat Exclusive Offer
    Get 300+ Practice Questions
    25 Video lessons and 6 Webinars for FREE

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    e-gmat Exclusive Offer
  • Varsity Tutors
    Award-winning private GMAT tutoring
    Register now and save up to $200

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    Varsity Tutors
  • PrepScholar GMAT
    5 Day FREE Trial
    Study Smarter, Not Harder

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    PrepScholar GMAT
  • EMPOWERgmat Slider
    1 Hour Free
    BEAT THE GMAT EXCLUSIVE

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    EMPOWERgmat Slider
  • Target Test Prep
    5-Day Free Trial
    5-day free, full-access trial TTP Quant

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    Target Test Prep
  • Economist Test Prep
    Free Trial & Practice Exam
    BEAT THE GMAT EXCLUSIVE

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    Economist Test Prep

1000 CR test1 no 16

This topic has 1 member reply
magical cook Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts Default Avatar
Joined
30 Jul 2006
Posted:
484 messages
Followed by:
1 members
Thanked:
2 times

1000 CR test1 no 16

Post Sat Mar 24, 2007 5:51 pm
Elapsed Time: 00:00
  • Lap #[LAPCOUNT] ([LAPTIME])
    Hi,

    The answer is B) but I don't understand why B is right....cause in text it says the third party only affects on of the two major parties equally which contradicts the answer B) that says neither of two parties get one-half of votes. (I think it's possible because third party ONLY affect one party...)

    In a political system with only two major parties, the entrance of a third-party candidate into an election race damages the chances of only one of the two major candidates. The third-party candidate always attracts some of the voters who might otherwise have voted for one of the two major candidates, but not voters who support the other candidate. Since a third-party candidacy affects the two major candidates unequally, for reasons neither of them has any control over, the practice is unfair and should not be allowed.

    If the factual information in the passage above is true, which of the following can be most reliably inferred from it?

    (A) If the political platform of the third party is a compromise position between that of the two major parties, the third party will draw its voters equally from the two major parties.
    (B) If, before the emergence of a third party, voters were divided equally between the two major parties, neither of the major parties is likely to capture much more than one-half of the vote.
    (C) A third-party candidate will not capture the votes of new voters who have never voted for candidates of either of the two major parties.
    (D) The political stance of a third party will be more radical than that of either of the two major parties.
    (E) The founders of a third party are likely to be a coalition consisting of former leaders of the two major parties.

    Need free GMAT or MBA advice from an expert? Register for Beat The GMAT now and post your question in these forums!
    rajesh_ctm Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts Default Avatar
    Joined
    27 Feb 2007
    Posted:
    135 messages
    Thanked:
    2 times
    Post Sun Mar 25, 2007 9:56 am
    In a political system with only two major parties, the entrance of a third-party candidate into an election race damages the chances of only one of the two major candidates.

    As per B, the two parties share 50%-50% candidates and a third party enters. The third party can damage the chances of only one party. So it can take some share from one party. But it does not increase the share of the other party. So none of these parties will get more than 50%. This can be reliably inferred from the passage. Where's the contradiction?

    Best Conversation Starters

    1 Vincen 152 topics
    2 lheiannie07 61 topics
    3 Roland2rule 49 topics
    4 LUANDATO 44 topics
    5 ardz24 40 topics
    See More Top Beat The GMAT Members...

    Most Active Experts

    1 image description Brent@GMATPrepNow

    GMAT Prep Now Teacher

    140 posts
    2 image description Rich.C@EMPOWERgma...

    EMPOWERgmat

    110 posts
    3 image description EconomistGMATTutor

    The Economist GMAT Tutor

    109 posts
    4 image description GMATGuruNY

    The Princeton Review Teacher

    107 posts
    5 image description DavidG@VeritasPrep

    Veritas Prep

    72 posts
    See More Top Beat The GMAT Experts