• Veritas Prep
    Free Veritas GMAT Class
    Experience Lesson 1 Live Free

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    Veritas Prep
  • Economist Test Prep
    Free Trial & Practice Exam
    BEAT THE GMAT EXCLUSIVE

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    Economist Test Prep
  • Target Test Prep
    5-Day Free Trial
    5-day free, full-access trial TTP Quant

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    Target Test Prep
  • PrepScholar GMAT
    5 Day FREE Trial
    Study Smarter, Not Harder

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    PrepScholar GMAT
  • Kaplan Test Prep
    Free Practice Test & Review
    How would you score if you took the GMAT

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    Kaplan Test Prep
  • EMPOWERgmat Slider
    1 Hour Free
    BEAT THE GMAT EXCLUSIVE

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    EMPOWERgmat Slider
  • e-gmat Exclusive Offer
    Get 300+ Practice Questions
    25 Video lessons and 6 Webinars for FREE

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    e-gmat Exclusive Offer
  • Varsity Tutors
    Award-winning private GMAT tutoring
    Register now and save up to $200

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    Varsity Tutors
  • Magoosh
    Magoosh
    Study with Magoosh GMAT prep

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    Magoosh

1000 CR test D no.1

This topic has 1 member reply
magical cook Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts Default Avatar
Joined
30 Jul 2006
Posted:
484 messages
Followed by:
1 members
Thanked:
2 times

1000 CR test D no.1

Post Thu Mar 22, 2007 7:30 pm
Elapsed Time: 00:00
  • Lap #[LAPCOUNT] ([LAPTIME])
    Hello,

    The answer is A) but I dont seem to get premise/conclusion and therefore can't get it right....


    Contrary to the statements of labor leaders, the central economic problem facing America today is not the distribution of wealth. It is productivity. With the productivity of U.S. industry stagnant, or even declining slightly, the economic pie is no longer growing. Labor leaders, of course, point to what they consider an unfair distribution of the slices of pie to justify their demands for further increases in wages and benefits. And in the past, when the pie was still growing, management could afford to acquiesce. No longer. Until productivity resumes its growth, there can be no justification for further increases in the compensation of workers.

    Which of the following statements by a labor leader focuses on the logical weakness in the argument above?

    (A) Although the economic pie is no longer growing, the portion of the pie allocated to American workers remains unjustly small.
    (B) If management fails to accommodate the demands of workers, labor leaders will be forced to call strikes that will cripple the operation of industry.
    (C) Although productivity is stagnant, the U.S. population is growing, so that the absolute size of the economic pie continues to grow as well.
    (D) As a labor leader, I can be concerned only with the needs of working people, not with the problems faced by management.
    (E) The stagnation of U.S. industry has been caused largely by factors-such as foreign competition-beyond the control of American workers.

    Need free GMAT or MBA advice from an expert? Register for Beat The GMAT now and post your question in these forums!
    bww Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts Default Avatar
    Joined
    29 Apr 2007
    Posted:
    55 messages
    Thanked:
    1 times
    Post Mon May 14, 2007 6:50 pm
    Answer here is A.

    The premise of the argument is that there is that productivity in the US is stagnant and thusly hurting the labor industries and their labor workers.

    B - sure, strikes could be effective in negotiations, but does not address a weakness in the argument and moreover, out of scope.

    C - a possible inference, but again, out of scope and also directly contradicts a statement presented as fact in the question stem. not a great choice.

    D - true, but too narrow in scope. this isn't about just management. it's about the relationship held by the labor force and management within the economy.

    E - could be a valid point, but like B does not address a weakness in the argument and out of scope.

    A directly addresses the question stem. It recognizes that the economic pie is no longer growing, but the distribution of productivity (and ultimately rewards and benefits) remains unadjusted to compensate for the efforts of the labor force. It implies that distribution has always been unbalanced (refer to third to last sentence), but at least management could accomodate the labor forces' demands because the markets were growing. Now that the markets have stagnated, the effects of unequal productivity distribution are made much more explicit.

    Best Conversation Starters

    1 Vincen 152 topics
    2 lheiannie07 61 topics
    3 Roland2rule 49 topics
    4 ardz24 40 topics
    5 LUANDATO 32 topics
    See More Top Beat The GMAT Members...

    Most Active Experts

    1 image description Brent@GMATPrepNow

    GMAT Prep Now Teacher

    141 posts
    2 image description EconomistGMATTutor

    The Economist GMAT Tutor

    107 posts
    3 image description GMATGuruNY

    The Princeton Review Teacher

    106 posts
    4 image description Rich.C@EMPOWERgma...

    EMPOWERgmat

    104 posts
    5 image description Matt@VeritasPrep

    Veritas Prep

    76 posts
    See More Top Beat The GMAT Experts