1000 CR

devesh · Posted: Sat Aug 04, 2007 4:32 am Post subject: 1000 CR

“If the forest continues to disappear at its present pace, the koala will approach extinction,” said the biologist.
“So all that is needed to save the koala is to stop deforestation,” said the politician.
Which one of the following statements is consistent with the biologist’s claim but not with the politician’s claim?
(A) Deforestation continues and the koala becomes extinct.
(B) Deforestation is stopped and the koala becomes extinct.
(C) Reforestation begins and the koala survives.
(D) Deforestation is slowed and the koala survives.
(E) Deforestation is slowed and the koala approaches extinction.

pls explain.

jayhawk2001 · Posted: Sat Aug 04, 2007 10:17 am Post subject:

Is it B ?

There could be other reasons for why the Koala can become extinct.
All we know for sure is that declining forests will lead the Koala
to extinction.

devesh · Posted: Sat Aug 04, 2007 9:35 pm Post subject:

thanx Jay
you are as always right.
Pls explain why B is consistent with biologist's claim.
I think it may or may not be consisitent.

saurabh_1922@yahoo.co.in · Posted: Tue Aug 07, 2007 6:37 pm Post subject: 1000 CR

Jay,Would you please explain why its B.
B is inconsistent with the politicians claim but how it is consistent with biologists claim.
According to Biologists if the forest disappears in the same rate,koala will approach extiction.
Now B says Deforestation is stopped but koala becomes extinct.Please explain

niaz69 · Posted: Tue Aug 07, 2007 8:23 pm Post subject:

The answer is D

In biologist's claim: rate of deforestation = to rate extinction of koala.
Answer D agrees to that. fullfilled one requirement

In politicial's claim: stop deforestation and save the koala, but accroding to answer D we are saving the koala by reducing the rate of deforestation. Hence we are disagreeing with the politicial.

beny · Posted: Wed Aug 08, 2007 12:16 am Post subject:

B says if deforestation is not stopped, the koala will become extinct.
It does not say if deforestation is stopped, the koala will not become extinct.

There is a distinction between these two statements.

Thus, B is consistent w/ the Biologist's claims.

devesh · Posted: Wed Aug 08, 2007 8:17 am Post subject: