1000 CR question

[This topic has 2 member replies]
Forum Index GMAT Verbal & Essays Critical Reasoning
Free $100 Amazon.com Gift Card - Buy a GMAT course using a Beat The GMAT discount code between Mar 8-22 and get a $100 Amazon.com Gift Card. Learn more!
Post New Topic   Post Reply

anubhav_goyal
Just gettin' started!

Default Avatar

Joined: 27 May 2007
Posts: 2

Thanks given: 0
Thanked 0 times in 0 posts
PostSun May 27, 2007 11:41 am
As one who has always believed that truth is our nation's surest weapon in the propaganda war against our foes, I am distressed by reports of "disinformation" campaigns by American intelligence agents in Western Europe. In a disinformation campaign, untruths are disseminated through gullible local journalists in order to damage the interests of our enemies and protect our own. Those who defend this practice say that lying is necessary to counter Soviet disinformation campaigns aimed at damaging America's political interests. These apologists contend that one must fight fire with fire. I would point out to the apologists that the fire department finds water more effective.

11. The author's main point is that
(A) although disinformation campaigns may be effective, they are unacceptable on ethical grounds
(B) America's moral standing in the world depends on its adherence to the truth
(C) the temporary political gains produced by disinformation campaigns generally give way to long-term losses
(D) Soviet disinformation campaigns have done little to damage America's standing in Europe
(E) disinformation campaigns do not effectively serve the political interests of the United States

Query: Answer provided as E. I am not sure as the argument does not talk about political interests of U.S.. Can somebod please elaborate?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Princeton Review
GMAT Instructor

Default Avatar

Joined: 16 Mar 2007
Posts: 22

Thanks given: 0
Thanked 0 times in 0 posts
PostFri Jun 01, 2007 1:44 pm
The author is saying that the truth is the surest weapon in our fight against our foes. If this is true, then the disinformation campaigns will not always help us, as stated in E.

Here's a look at the remaining answers:

A-The author makes no argument that is based in morality.
B-The author does not discuss moral standing.
C-There is no discussion of long-term vs. short-term effects in the argument.
D-There is no discussion of the effects that the campaign has had

As you can see, the key thing is to focus exclusively on what the author said, not what they might have meant of what facts might explain the situation. Think inside the box.
_________________
Matt McIver

Princeton Review Instructor
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
anubhav_goyal
Just gettin' started!

Default Avatar

Joined: 27 May 2007
Posts: 2

Thanks given: 0
Thanked 0 times in 0 posts
PostSat Jun 02, 2007 10:48 am
Hi Matt,

Thank you for the exp.

But i still fail to understand E as answer.

You agree that the author has assumed that "truth is the weapon for U.S." So, doesnt truth form a part of moral values. Also, doesnt B highlight the importance of truth.

Please suggest.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   

Post New Topic   Post Reply All times are GMT - 7 Hours
Page 1 of 1
 
Forum Index GMAT Verbal & Essays Critical Reasoning
Most Active Members in Last 30 Days
1. harsh.champ 562 posts
2. shashank.ism 368 posts
3. thephoenix 319 posts
4. kstv 310 posts
5. ajith 279 posts
See More Top Beat The GMAT Members
Most Active Experts in Last 30 Days
1. lunarpower
Manhattan GMAT Teacher 		87 posts
2. Stuart Kovinsky
Kaplan GMAT Teacher 		63 posts
3. Lisa Anderson
Stacy Blackman Consulting 		54 posts
4. Testluv
Kaplan GMAT Teacher 		49 posts
5. Bryant@VeritasPrep
Veritas Prep 		41 posts
See More Top Beat The GMAT Experts